<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>banane - Latest Comments in recent reads, October</title><link>http://banane.disqus.com/</link><description>I write about SF, writing, and technology.</description><atom:link href="https://banane.disqus.com/recent_reads_october/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:10:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: recent reads, October</title><link>http://www.banane.com/2007/10/27/recent-reads-october/#comment-4733517</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i dont know if Spinoza  believed in God.&lt;br&gt;I agree with the view that Einstein either&lt;br&gt;didnt or didnt in any meaningful way.&lt;br&gt;If you believe nature runs according to&lt;br&gt;sime rules, and these rules have a &lt;br&gt;certain aesthetic, but that is an &lt;br&gt;aesthetic that appeals to humans, but&lt;br&gt;you decide to label that "god", that's&lt;br&gt;ok, but you dont have anything in &lt;br&gt;common with the people who believe&lt;br&gt;in god in the theistic sense.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;i think you have to consider god&lt;br&gt;something outside of science. if&lt;br&gt;you make it part of science or equal&lt;br&gt;to science, i think you've stretched&lt;br&gt;the category past its breaking point.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;TMWTGF(steven weinberg, einstein,&lt;br&gt;spinoza, god) for a better statement&lt;br&gt;of this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Spinoza's Blog</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:10:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: recent reads, October</title><link>http://www.banane.com/2007/10/27/recent-reads-october/#comment-4733519</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You think Spinoza didn't believe in God? I think he did- in the sense that Nature is God- which he states quite clearly in Ethics.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">banane</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:13:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: recent reads, October</title><link>http://www.banane.com/2007/10/27/recent-reads-october/#comment-4733518</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To anybody who is reading this- the anonymous post above is Partha. I don't allow anonymous posts, but I know it's him so I'll let this slide.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">banane</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:12:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: recent reads, October</title><link>http://www.banane.com/2007/10/27/recent-reads-october/#comment-4733516</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;I guess his stuff is used quite &lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;a bit by Einstein, Hawking, and &lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;other modern scientists.&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;einstein ... and many other reasonable&lt;br&gt;people since, not just scientists ...&lt;br&gt;pretty much people who are not dogmatic&lt;br&gt;nutjobs ... are "sympathetic" to &lt;br&gt;Spinoza, but i wouldnt really say they&lt;br&gt;"use" Spinoza in their scientific work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;of the "natural philosophers" newton&lt;br&gt;of course revolutionized everything.&lt;br&gt;descartes has some value as does liebtiz,but i dont think you can say&lt;br&gt;much for the scientific significance&lt;br&gt;of spinoza.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;so when you use a word like "use spinoza" i think it implies you mean&lt;br&gt;the scientists qua scientists, while&lt;br&gt;his influence is really on them&lt;br&gt;as scientists qua reflective people.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;this has been discussed a lot lately&lt;br&gt;because of the wave of aethism books.&lt;br&gt;lots of people talking about "did &lt;br&gt;einstein believe in god" refering to&lt;br&gt;his comment about believing in spinoza's&lt;br&gt;god". [which i agree with the people &lt;br&gt;who think that's just a clever and &lt;br&gt;literate dodge to avoid saying "no"].&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Spinoza's Blog</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 06:25:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>