http://banane.disqus.com/I write about SF, writing, and technology.enMon, 29 Jan 2007 02:15:19 -0000http://www.banane.com/2007/01/16/tech-post-7-women-and-open-source-again/#comment-4733380<p>I had a friend who worked on the 72¢ study. The figures were fudged to fit the hypothesis.</p>What, me worry?Mon, 29 Jan 2007 02:15:19 -0000http://www.banane.com/2007/01/16/tech-post-7-women-and-open-source-again/#comment-4733382<p>number of blogs about my cat: <a href="http://technorati.com/search/cat" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://technorati.com/search/cat">4,131,359</a></p>tharpoWed, 17 Jan 2007 17:19:19 -0000http://www.banane.com/2007/01/16/tech-post-7-women-and-open-source-again/#comment-4733381<p>Hear hear! What she said.</p><p>I especially identified with the comments that taking time and diverting resources to learning the latest thing is VERY difficult to do when you're already hustling to make the biased salary dollar stretch.</p><p>A number of men I know don't cotton to the discussion that women still make less than men because they know of a handful of women who do. But the majority is the issue here, and as a state of the union point, it is still woefully relevant.</p>Nancy MTue, 16 Jan 2007 23:11:47 -0000